One can only wonder if there are links with the Govenment's wooing of Harradine over cross media ownership laws. Didn't they pull off a similar trick when seeking approval for selling off half of Telstra?
Yes, the Internet censorship laws (which, as tabloid TV programmes are showing, do little to stop kids from looking at sickening hardcore pornography) were used to buy Harradine.
Important issue this: and I think it has been going on by little steps for nearly two decades now. Someone made a point about i'net c'ship, in that it matters little really, if the big companies that run the search engines preferentially direct searchers to certain sites, it's quite hard to find dissenting views, and it will appear to the casual luser that one opinion holds currency that it might not actually have. And vice versa. reasonableness and fairness are different things.
Andrew, as I recall Harradine then said "thanks, it's real generous of you" and gave them the finger. At which point Meg Lees came to the govt's rescue...
I often wonder whether it is a new trend to conflate criticism of a nation's government with criticism of said nation's values/mythology/ruling tribe, or whether this has been with us forever and I'm just noticing now.
On the topic of banning the Irving film, nonsensical as Irving's arguments are, they need to be aired (or at least, not be banned from being aired) so they can be publicly ridiculed and exposed as lies. These Holocaust revisionists are getting increasingly cocky, and in a few more years all the eyewitnesses to the Holocaust will be dead.